Skip to content

Intake Concept


📥 Intake Subteam - Phase 1 Conceptualization Deep Dive ([UPDATE/LOCK])

Locked Concept: Extended Segmented Roller Intake $\rightarrow$ $35^\circ$ Ramp Transfer

Detailed Functional Design (The 'How'): The Intake system uses a rigid frame supporting segmented rollers to achieve reliable throughput by employing a crucial two-stage motion profile:

  1. Stage 1 (Acquisition): The rollers drive into the game pieces at a measured, low rotational speed ($\omega_{low}$) while applying slight vertical lift. This minimizes initial friction losses and guarantees kinetic energy transfer from the floor contact into the pile.
    • Goal: Predictable, low-energy acquisition ($\text{Contact} \to$ Pile).
  2. Stage 2 (Transfer): Once the game piece is securely within the intake volume, a controlled linkage/drive mechanism maintains and drives the rollers into the $35^\circ$ ramp. This transitions the system from slow acquisition to high-velocity linear acceleration, converting sustained rotational energy into consistent exit velocity ($V_{in}$).
    • Goal: High-efficiency, non-binding transfer ($\text{Pile} \to$ Ramp).

Phase 1 Action Protocol: Low-Fidelity Simulation (The Verification) Our immediate task is to move beyond the existence of the concept and define its operational constraints.

Critical Success Variables (Must be proven in Phase 1): * $\theta_{pickup}$ & $\omega$: The required starting rotational speed and angle that ensures reliable, low-friction contact from the game floor. * $\alpha_{ramp}$: The $35^\circ$ angle acts as the fixed velocity integrator, converting controlled kinetic input into a predictable linear output. * Synchronization ($\mathbf{T_{cycle}}$): The timing of the transition from Stage 1 to Stage 2 must be instantaneous and seamless to prevent micro-jams or under-driving.

Next Engineering Task: Define the mechanical details of the roller/bar frame and the precise conditions that trigger the Stage 1 $\to$ Stage 2 transition. This moves us toward a Proto-Alpha buildable model.

Comments